EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI INTERVESI STUNTING DI WILAYAH KEPULAUAN: PENDEKATAN ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS BIAYA

Main Article Content

Zenderi Wardani
Dadang Sukandar
Yayuk Farida Baliwati
Hadi Riyadi

Abstract

Local governments are responsible for tackling nutritional problems, especially stunting, through investment in program financing as well as possible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implementing stunting intervention programs, especially in archipelagic areas such as the Bangka Belitung. The data collection locations were in Bangka Regency and West Bangka Regency in January 2020. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by calculating the Cost-Effectiveness Incremental Ratio (CEIR). The cost perspective used the direct expenditure of activities in the local government budget document for each activity. The results showed that the cost of stunting-sensitive interventions was higher than specific interventions in the two study sites. A one percent reduction in stunting prevalence through specific interventions in Bangka Regency is more cost-effective at IDR 9,020,280,378 compared to sensitive interventions of IDR 17,959,764,254 per one percent stunting. West Bangka Regency showed the opposite: sensitive interventions are more cost-effective by Rp. 3,562,614,557 per one percent reduction in stunting compared to specific Rp interventions. 17,517,775,305. The effectiveness of specific and sensitive interventions is a factor that influences the calculation of CEIR. The evaluation study results are an alternative for policymakers in formulating and planning stunting prevention to increase the effectiveness of interventions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI INTERVESI STUNTING DI WILAYAH KEPULAUAN: PENDEKATAN ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS BIAYA. (2023). TEMU ILMIAH NASIONAL PERSAGI, 4, 325-332. https://www.tin.persagi.org/index.php/tin/article/view/75
Section
KARYA PENELITIAN II: GIZI KOMUNITAS

How to Cite

EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI INTERVESI STUNTING DI WILAYAH KEPULAUAN: PENDEKATAN ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS BIAYA. (2023). TEMU ILMIAH NASIONAL PERSAGI, 4, 325-332. https://www.tin.persagi.org/index.php/tin/article/view/75

References

Balitbangkes Kemenkes RI. Hasil Utama Riskesdas 2018. Jakarta; 2018.

Kemenkes RI. Buku Saku Pemantauan Status Gizi Tahun 2017. Jakarta: Direktoran Gizi Masyarakat; 2018.

TNP2K. Kabupaten/ Kota Prioritas untuk Intervensi Anak Kerdil (Stunting). Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan ; 2017.

Sudfeld CR, McCoy DC, Danaei G, Fink G, Ezzati M, Andrews KG, et al. Linear growth and child development in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):e1266–75.

de Onis M, Branca F. Childhood stunting: A global perspective. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 2016;12:12–26.

Black RE, Alderman H, Bhutta ZA, Gillespie S, Haddad L, Horton S, et al. Maternal and child nutrition: Building momentum for impact. The Lancet. 2013;382(9890):372–5.

Hoddinott J, Alderman H, Behrman JR, Haddad L, Horton S. The economic rationale for investing in stunting reduction. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 2013;9(S2):69–82.

Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Strategi Nasional Percepatan Pencegahan Stunting Periode 2018 - 2024 [Internet]. Jakarta: TNP2K; 2018. 86 p. Available from: http://tnp2k.go.id/filemanager/files/Rakornis 2018/Stranas Percepatan Pencegahan Anak Kerdil.pdf

BKKBN. Peraturan Kepala BKKBN Nomor 12 Tahun 2021.

Wieser S, Tzogiou C. Does it work? Is it worth it? Evaluating the costs and benefits of nutritional interventions. In: Sustainable Nutrition in a Changing World. 2017.

Jain R, Grabner M, Onukwugha E. Sensitivity analysis in cost-effectiveness studies: from guidelines to practice. Pharmacoeconomics [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2022 Jun 24];29(4):297–314. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21395350/

Mustafa N. Cost-effectiveness analysis: Educational interventions that reduce the incidence of HIV/AIDS infection in Kenyan teenagers. International Journal of Educational Development. 2018;62.

Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaffey MF, Walker N, Horton S, et al. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost? Lancet. 2013;382(9890):452–77.

International Food Policy Research Institute. The 2016 Global Nutrition Report. Global Nutrition Report 2016:From Promise to Impact: Ending Malnutrition by 2030. Global Nutrition Report - From promise to impact: ending malnutrition by 2030. 2016.

Wardani Z, Sukandar D, Baliwati YF, Riyadi H. Intervention Strategies for Stunting Based on Analytic Network Process in Bangka Belitung Province of Indonesia. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 2021;21(3).

Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, de Onis M, Ezzati M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. The Lancet. 2008;371(9608):243–60.

Sari M, de Pee S, Bloem MW, Sun K, Thorne-Lyman AL, Moench-Pfanner R, et al. Higher household expenditure on animal-source and nongrain foods lowers the risk of stunting among children 0-59 months old in Indonesia: Implications of rising food prices. Journal of Nutrition. 2010;140(1):195–200.

Rachmi CN, Agho KE, Li M, Baur LA. Stunting, underweight and overweight in children aged 2.0-4.9 years in Indonesia: Prevalence trends and associated risk factors. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):1–17.

Ali NB, Tahsina T, Emdadul Hoque DM, Hasan MM, Iqbal A, Huda TM, et al. Association of food security and other socioeconomic factors with dietary diversity and nutritional statuses of children aged 6-59 months in rural Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):1–18.

Rammohan A, Pritchard B, Dibley M. Home gardens as a predictor of enhanced dietary diversity and food security in rural Myanmar. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–13.

Torlesse H, Cronin AA, Sebayang SK, Nandy R. Determinants of stunting in Indonesian children: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey indicate a prominent role for the water, sanitation and hygiene sector in stunting reduction. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2016;16(1):1–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3339-8

Budge S, Parker AH, Hutchings PT, Garbutt C. Environmental enteric dysfunction and child stunting. Nutrition Reviews. 2019;77(4):240–53.

Wardani Z, Sukandar D, Farida Baliwati Y, Riyadi H. Sebuah Alternatif: Indeks Stunting Sebagai Evaluasi Kebijakan Intervensi Balita Stunting di Indonesia. Gizi Indonesia. 2021(1):21–30.

Mistry SK, Hossain MB, Arora A. Maternal nutrition counselling is associated with reduced stunting prevalence and improved feeding practices in early childhood: A post-program comparison study. Nutrition Journal. 2019;18(1):1–9.

Attanasio O, Baker-Henningham H, Bernal R, Meghir C, Pineda D, Rubio-Codina M. Early Stimulation and Nutrition: The Impacts of a Scalable Intervention. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018;

Mary S, Saravia-Matus S, Gomez y Paloma S. Does nutrition-sensitive aid reduce the prevalence of undernourishment? Food Policy [Internet]. 2018;74(March 2017):100–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.008

Kostyak L, Shaw DM, Elger B, Annaheim B. A means of improving public health in low- and middle-income countries? Benefits and challenges of international public–private partnerships. Vol. 149, Public Health. Elsevier B.V.; 2017. p. 120–9.

Kim DD, Silver MC, Kunst N, Cohen JT, Ollendorf DA, Neumann PJ. Correction to: Perspective and Costing in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, 1974–2018. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020;38(12).